b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 10016762 (Thread)

# I was going to post the small one. But it looks a bit squished.
(I helped save b3ta! Airman Gabber Living life like a 70's BBC presenter, Thu 22 Apr 2010, 15:52, archived)
# Hmm, it does too
I think the FP needs to be redesigned. Sometimes 400 pixels really isn't enough.

Top work though
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Thu 22 Apr 2010, 15:55, archived)
# I think 400 is up from the original limits.
And the old modem days of tiny filesize limits.
(I helped save b3ta! Airman Gabber Living life like a 70's BBC presenter, Thu 22 Apr 2010, 15:58, archived)
# you can probably track exactly when it changed
by looking in anyone's b3tards account and seeing when the width of their pictures suddenly jumped from 280 to 400...
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Thu 22 Apr 2010, 16:04, archived)
# first 280px wasn't enough, now 400px isn't enough
some people are never happy
(Canazza is mostly listening to Yes, Thu 22 Apr 2010, 15:58, archived)
# They'll be allowing Flash animations and youtube posts next.
*tchoh*
(I helped save b3ta! Airman Gabber Living life like a 70's BBC presenter, Thu 22 Apr 2010, 16:01, archived)
# damn right
in theory it should be possible to make the front page flexible so that the pictures go up to some larger maximum if something wider gets FP'd - say 600 pixels or so - but if not it stays down at 400 if they want. how many people still browse with less than 1000 wide? (they can tell that by looking at the server logs, easy.) the space can be taken from the weblogs bit if necessary.

but it might actually be a horrific job to make it dynamically resize like that. depends how the code was built, i guess.

(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Thu 22 Apr 2010, 16:03, archived)