my mistake todaywas apparently posting an image under 100k which was 404px wide × 1,917pixels long!
so far there's been no outrage about the 1917 pixel bit!
(so far there's been no outrage about the 1917 pixel bit!
Clay hopes this bit is long enough to promote my websi,
Mon 9 Apr 2012, 18:20,
archived)
1917There is no complaint about the 1917 length as that is clearly not long enough. surely there must be a "too long" rule in that FAQ somewhere.
And I don't see what the fuss is about. 404 just means you are going that extra 1% to make us laugh. Which has clearly worked. You've dragged a lurker out of his lurking to look confused at all the comedy fuss.
I think you should now rotate your image 90 degrees and post it again.
(And I don't see what the fuss is about. 404 just means you are going that extra 1% to make us laugh. Which has clearly worked. You've dragged a lurker out of his lurking to look confused at all the comedy fuss.
I think you should now rotate your image 90 degrees and post it again.
Batter Pudding Hurler is a figment of your imagination,
Mon 9 Apr 2012, 18:32,
archived)
pffftwell you're not as confused as I am, I can guarantee that
seeya :)
(seeya :)
Clay hopes this bit is long enough to promote my websi,
Mon 9 Apr 2012, 18:40,
archived)