I'm not sure if that'll go inuntil we think of a way to finance the thing. I could be wrong, but I think all the bandwidth eaten by auto-refreshing is part of why m3ss3ng3r was so bandwidth-hungry.
(
supermoore: HUNG,
Fri 29 Aug 2003, 22:23,
archived)
To correct myself.It doesn't have to work that way, and will be much less bandwidth-hungry without all the Javascript.
( supermoore: HUNG,
Fri 29 Aug 2003, 22:24,
archived)
it should bereasonably light this time, for the messages it's under 1k of code that'd refresh
( Dr. Kitteny Berk almost certainly drunk,
Fri 29 Aug 2003, 22:25,
archived)