I agreein Descates' Meditations he explains in the first chapter how he must doubt everything. then goes on this massive leap of faith that he exists because he doubts and doubt is a type of thinking. seems contradictory, in my opinion.
although, his ontological argument in the next chapter is second to none (as st anselm makes very little logical sense)
and im guessing this post is going to be particularly squashed up.
(,
Sat 19 Jun 2004, 20:55,
archived)
although, his ontological argument in the next chapter is second to none (as st anselm makes very little logical sense)
and im guessing this post is going to be particularly squashed up.