b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Visions of the Future: Circa 1950 » Message 3450221

[challenge entry] Compo entry


Edit; Updated with new improved less than 200K sizeness

From the Visions of the Future: Circa 1950 challenge. See all 283 entries (closed)

(Freegan Bikefascist, Tue 13 Jul 2004, 1:06, archived)
# ouch on the file size
reduce colours, reduce em hard
(I helped save b3ta! Wildheart Baby. Drunken Mess In A Good Way, Tue 13 Jul 2004, 1:09, archived)
# Wrestle
harder.
(I helped save b3ta! wibblywobbly - helping ugly people get laid since 1982, Tue 13 Jul 2004, 1:10, archived)
# tha treally should be linked
200-250kb is really the limit to what you should post on the board.

It's good though.
(I helped save b3ta! StickFigureNinja is worried he may be on the list, Tue 13 Jul 2004, 1:10, archived)
# A compliment from the Stick Figure Ninja is praise indeed
May I call you SFN? Your stuff is top.

Cheers for the advice everyone. Worked on the colours, now less than 200K
(Freegan Bikefascist, Wed 14 Jul 2004, 1:38, archived)
# I wonder how those things work.
If they were made with equilateral triangles, the dome would be flat. If they were made with slightly pointed triangles grouped into hexagons, with the points pointing to the middle to make very shallow pyramids, the dome would still be flat.
(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Tue 13 Jul 2004, 1:11, archived)
# You're thinking too 2 dimensionally *man*
They're not euclidean triangles.
(I helped save b3ta! supermoore: HUNG, Tue 13 Jul 2004, 1:16, archived)
# They can made with slightly pointed triangles grouped in fives
to make very flat pyramids with pentagonal bases, which are then joined together by equilateral triangles.
But in that picture they are grouped in sixes. Which makes no sense. But I'm sure I've seen domes with them grouped in sixes, too.
/not actually sure at all
(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Tue 13 Jul 2004, 1:38, archived)