b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 3898899 (Thread)

# We're doomed...
...either way.

As an American said:

'With all the talent and ability America has, these two are all it could muster for the voters?'
(, Wed 3 Nov 2004, 13:07, archived)
# my thoughts exactly.
but for many reasons kerry would be better:

#1: lesser of 2 evils
#2: he'd be new, it'd take him about a year to get used being a fuckup, so that'd be a year less of destruction.
#3: he can spell, and speak properly.
(, Wed 3 Nov 2004, 13:09, archived)
# Hmmm
I guess 1 remains to be seen.
He's new so he might fuck up FASTER.
He's American. No Americans speak or spell PROPERLY ;)
(, Wed 3 Nov 2004, 13:10, archived)
# Good point
I'm planning a movie about the difference of English and American leaders soon.

*cough serve in a war cough*
(, Wed 3 Nov 2004, 13:11, archived)
# at least he comes across as
being at least semi-intellegent, able to string a sentence together and diplomatic.

Bush just comes across as being an arogant, illiterate, incoherant, insensitive donkey.
(, Wed 3 Nov 2004, 14:39, archived)
# You missed
oblivious, ignorant, and messiah complexed. A complete grade A cunt.

Edit: Oh, and bigoted.
(, Wed 3 Nov 2004, 15:11, archived)
# oh yeah
them too.

thanks
(, Wed 3 Nov 2004, 16:40, archived)
# Sorry to point this out
But using the epithet 'Illiterate' along with 'ar(r)ogant, intell(i)gent, and incoher(e)nt isn't helping your case any.

F7... dude!
(, Wed 3 Nov 2004, 22:13, archived)
# /sigh

pedant.

Like my spelling is the big issue.

He's in charge of a whole f***ing country. That's slightly more important.
(, Thu 4 Nov 2004, 17:37, archived)
# He's
got a point though.
(, Thu 4 Nov 2004, 19:18, archived)