but
what is the correct interpretation of the image, as my old semiotics lecturer might ask?
( ,
Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:26,
archived)
I think the kitten's been bumming the duck
cause of the subject... and cause it seems to be trying to intimidate it
( ,
Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:30,
archived)
no well you see
the suggestion is that the source image had a correct interpretation before any photoshoppery was done to it, something along the lines of "kittens and ducklings should be friends", but it may equally have been "you have to be this tall to ride the duck rollercoaster at my theme park young man"
( ,
Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:34,
archived)
I think the kitten has already ridden the "duck rollercoaster".
( ,
Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:40,
archived)
I like the roller coaster theorey
Wherever it came from is what it means, I know, but I do like the idea that the duck is threatening the kitten (even though thats not what I was saying earlier)
fuck, I don't know.
( ,
Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:42,
archived)
fuck, I don't know.
well
we have to accept that the image may not actually hold any meaning of and by itself, just the meaning we place upon it
i'll get my coat
( ,
Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:44,
archived)
i'll get my coat
well,
does anything have any meaning?
maybe nothing means anything, and in an attempt to understand what's happening we assign a meaning to everything, even though it's all meaningless
( ,
Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:50,
archived)
maybe nothing means anything, and in an attempt to understand what's happening we assign a meaning to everything, even though it's all meaningless