b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 4260359

# Bad kitty, bad.
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:07, archived)
# I don't know what to say to that
but I'm oddly entertained
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:08, archived)
# KITTENS ARE GAY.
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:09, archived)
# EVERYONE! THE DUCK'S BEEN BUMMING THE CAT!
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:09, archived)
# I saw it the other way round
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:20, archived)
# I think your view is the way it was meant to be
I was attempting to misinterpret the image for comic effect, and failed dismally.
*goes to flog himself*
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:23, archived)
# but
what is the correct interpretation of the image, as my old semiotics lecturer might ask?
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:26, archived)
# I think the kitten's been bumming the duck
cause of the subject... and cause it seems to be trying to intimidate it
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:30, archived)
# no well you see
the suggestion is that the source image had a correct interpretation before any photoshoppery was done to it, something along the lines of "kittens and ducklings should be friends", but it may equally have been "you have to be this tall to ride the duck rollercoaster at my theme park young man"
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:34, archived)
[challenge entry]
I think the kitten has already ridden the "duck rollercoaster".
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:40, archived)
# not possible
it's for ducks of a certain size only
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:42, archived)
# HA!
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:42, archived)
# I like the roller coaster theorey
Wherever it came from is what it means, I know, but I do like the idea that the duck is threatening the kitten (even though thats not what I was saying earlier)
fuck, I don't know.
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:42, archived)
# well
we have to accept that the image may not actually hold any meaning of and by itself, just the meaning we place upon it

i'll get my coat
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:44, archived)
# well,
does anything have any meaning?
maybe nothing means anything, and in an attempt to understand what's happening we assign a meaning to everything, even though it's all meaningless
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:50, archived)
# stop it
or we'll start talking about signs and signifiers and become post-structuralists

as the guy from Snap says:

"and you don't want that"

(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:54, archived)
# ok
I don't know what a post-structuralist is, but I'll pretend I do*



*may not happen
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:59, archived)
# oh
we need invisible smilies
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:27, archived)
# I don't believe in smilies when it comes to jokes
if something requires a smiley for people to know it's a joke, it's obviously shit and shouldnt be said in the first place.
In my opinion.
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:33, archived)
# kinda
I refuse to use smilies

But sometimes I really feel the need for them.

Coz - I dunno - face-to-face you could give a clue that it's a joke, Roll your eyes or something.
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:45, archived)
# I suppose it does help a lot
with sarcasm
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:51, archived)
# and that's why I look like an idiot on the message boards
cause I can't detect it nor can others tell when I'm being sarcastic...
ooh the internet...
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:53, archived)
# Is that how all ducks get their waddle?
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:10, archived)
# hehehe
this works...
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:13, archived)
# hmm
(, Sun 13 Feb 2005, 2:26, archived)