b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » anti social suppression » Message 4318600

[challenge entry] Ban Furries
They should be outlawed or used as replacements for foxes in fox hunts


From the anti social suppression challenge. See all 246 entries (closed)

(, Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:21, archived)
# ?
I almost became enraged before I saw the pic...just a misunderstanding.

www.superfurry.com
(, Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:25, archived)
# pleaaaaase.... no more 'ban some random thing' 'here let's put a crossed circle over a picture'...
IT'S NOT FUNNY
(, Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:29, archived)
# seconded.
It's like a really poor bandwagon.
(, Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:30, archived)
# You should encapsulate this insight
in the form of a picture with a crossed circle over it.

I do feel sorry for whever is judging this week ...
(, Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:37, archived)
# The whole competition
does not really leave you much room to do anything other than bung a "no this" circle over something that is deemed offencive to individuals, judging by looking at other posts and yes mine including, judging will be a pain in the arse.
(, Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:42, archived)
# I think the hope was
that people would do pictures of bizzare things being banned, rather than chavs, celebrities etc. The wording of the compo leaves a lot to be desired.

e.g. Neville's 'No Gronking Fossils in this area' post was inspired.

It's a difficult one though, and I'm not going to enter.
(, Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:45, archived)
# I agree
with No Gronking Fossils, I do like that one, it has gone heavily on banning chavs and the constant repetition of banning Tesco brand chavs and such forth. Even with the competiton picture itself, it features the infamous red crossed circle >.< and to think this competition still has nearly a week to run.
(, Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:50, archived)
# Yes.
It's unfortunate that this discussion came up in your post, because it isn't your fault that this is the way the compo is going. And yours is one of the better ones, since it doesn't include chavs.
(, Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:49, archived)
# I feel
its good this discussion came up in my post, thanks for giving it justice :) I do hope people do read this and stop repeating banning chavs, unless they can think of something more original, like um, "No chavs allowed unless accompanied by a blow up sheep"
(, Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:55, archived)