The whole competitiondoes not really leave you much room to do anything other than bung a 'no this' circle over something that is deemed offencive to individuals, judging by looking at other posts and yes mine including, judging will be a pain in the arse.
(,
Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:42,
archived)
I think the hope wasthat people would do pictures of bizzare things being banned, rather than chavs, celebrities etc. The wording of the compo leaves a lot to be desired.
e.g. Neville's 'No Gronking Fossils in this area' post was inspired.
It's a difficult one though, and I'm not going to enter.
(e.g. Neville's 'No Gronking Fossils in this area' post was inspired.
It's a difficult one though, and I'm not going to enter.
Spunkmeyer,
Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:45,
archived)
I agreewith No Gronking Fossils, I do like that one, it has gone heavily on banning chavs and the constant repetition of banning Tesco brand chavs and such forth. Even with the competiton picture itself, it features the infamous red crossed circle >.< and to think this competition still has nearly a week to run.
(,
Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:50,
archived)
Yes.It's unfortunate that this discussion came up in your post, because it isn't your fault that this is the way the compo is going. And yours is one of the better ones, since it doesn't include chavs.
(,
Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:49,
archived)
I feelits good this discussion came up in my post, thanks for giving it justice :) I do hope people do read this and stop repeating banning chavs, unless they can think of something more original, like um, "No chavs allowed unless accompanied by a blow up sheep"
(,
Sun 27 Feb 2005, 15:55,
archived)