my firstest entry
be kind

and

(boink, Mon 23 May 2005, 18:10, archived)

I would

( Mykeyboy A Quantum-State Holistic Standing Wavefront, Mon 23 May 2005, 18:12, archived)

Arf!

(Dr Hotdog is all about the road rash, Mon 23 May 2005, 18:15, archived)

there must be some breach of privacy, selling photos of saddam like that
even if he is a naughty man
(Sticky Label, Mon 23 May 2005, 18:12, archived)

Or rather a breach of the Geneva convention
Somewhat more serious, but debatable whether it actually occured as the US army said they didn't release the photos (but who the hell did?).
( fool_on_the_hill, Mon 23 May 2005, 18:15, archived)

the arabs dunnit
clever bunnies.
( tuckshop superstore everything must go... far away., Mon 23 May 2005, 18:17, archived)

aye
i heard a rumour sadam was trying for playgirl
( Cashy, Mon 23 May 2005, 18:25, archived)

rumor has it
they ddn't post the next pic, in which he pinches his nipples and winks
(boink, Mon 23 May 2005, 18:36, archived)

I'm not entirely sure what good it does
to give privacy rights to very naughty people. It seems to me the only contribution a hardboiled ex-tyrant can make to the rest of mankind is as an object of curiosity.
(_Felix ekorrar med brösten, Mon 23 May 2005, 18:35, archived)

Well if Micahel Douglas and Catherine B3ta Jones
can sue for privacy I'm sure Sadaam can....He's made less crap films than they have
( edjogs, Mon 23 May 2005, 19:05, archived)

Hooray for naked men!



( Grampa, Mon 23 May 2005, 18:23, archived)

ooh
don't we all know...NO! IT'S NOT!
(Onion Terror. posting 3 images a year, Mon 23 May 2005, 18:42, archived)

one more bad pun i couldn't resist


ok im going to work now.
(boink, Mon 23 May 2005, 19:15, archived)