there must be some breach of privacy, selling photos of saddam like that
even if he is a naughty man
(
0800221155 Coldseal windows,
Mon 23 May 2005, 18:12,
archived)
Or rather a breach of the Geneva convention
Somewhat more serious, but debatable whether it actually occured as the US army said they didn't release the photos (but who the hell did?).
(
fool_on_the_hill,
Mon 23 May 2005, 18:15,
archived)
the arabs dunnit
clever bunnies.
(
agent-c fulfilling your wants and perverting your needs,
Mon 23 May 2005, 18:17,
archived)
aye
i heard a rumour sadam was trying for playgirl
(
Cashy,
Mon 23 May 2005, 18:25,
archived)
rumor has it
they ddn't post the next pic, in which he pinches his nipples and winks
(
boink,
Mon 23 May 2005, 18:36,
archived)
I'm not entirely sure what good it does
to give privacy rights to very naughty people. It seems to me the only contribution a hardboiled ex-tyrant can make to the rest of mankind is as an object of curiosity.
(
_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences,
Mon 23 May 2005, 18:35,
archived)
Well if Micahel Douglas and Catherine B3ta Jones
can sue for privacy I'm sure Sadaam can....He's made less crap films than they have
(
edjogs Collared doves are shit.,
Mon 23 May 2005, 19:05,
archived)