b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Imaginary Applications for Web 2.0 » Message 5850940

[challenge entry] If b3ta were like digg.com

From the Imaginary Applications for Web 2.0 challenge. See all 86 entries (closed)

(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:33, archived)
# Haha
Clickwooyayetc
(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:34, archived)
# Hahaha
Yay for premise-spoiling summaries! :)
(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:34, archived)
# it really alters the humus of the pics
For example, the descriptions sound rather lame, but the pics are funny, of course.
(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:35, archived)
# Arf!
(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:35, archived)
# Heh.. Excellent!
I have a hilarious bookmarked page from Digg for the stuff they said when my star wars 168k found its way on there - "Wow that was bad. Not only did they skip many scenes, the pixel art was bad. It was like a 12 year old made a Star Wars cartoon. No digg."
(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:37, archived)
# oh, it's full of wankers now
half the comments are from people with no social skills (e.g. Oh, an apple story. LAME!!10101001). On the other hand, the articles are often great.
(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:41, archived)
# digg has all the Web2.0 social-ness going for it...
but Slashdot is a much better place for real arcticles. And um, intellectual discussion. Yes.
(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:49, archived)
# I have both on RSS feeds.
Meh. I'm trying my best for this compo. Not much hummus in there to find, is there?
(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:57, archived)
# I don't see why they can't just get along
(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 21:02, archived)
# slashdot is uglier
and gets the stories later.
(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 21:11, archived)
# Haha
(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 21:00, archived)
# unrinating
*arf*
(, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 21:17, archived)