If b3ta were like digg.com
From the Imaginary Applications for Web 2.0 challenge. See all 86 entries (closed)
( , Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:33, archived)
From the Imaginary Applications for Web 2.0 challenge. See all 86 entries (closed)
( , Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:33, archived)
it really alters the humus of the pics
For example, the descriptions sound rather lame, but the pics are funny, of course.
( ,
Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:35,
archived)
Heh.. Excellent!
I have a hilarious bookmarked page from Digg for the stuff they said when my star wars 168k found its way on there - "Wow that was bad. Not only did they skip many scenes, the pixel art was bad. It was like a 12 year old made a Star Wars cartoon. No digg."
( ,
Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:37,
archived)
oh, it's full of wankers now
half the comments are from people with no social skills (e.g. Oh, an apple story. LAME!!10101001). On the other hand, the articles are often great.
( ,
Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:41,
archived)
digg has all the Web2.0 social-ness going for it...
but Slashdot is a much better place for real arcticles. And um, intellectual discussion. Yes.
( ,
Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:49,
archived)