i've never noticed a problem, even from home with my crappy 2 meg connection
(, Fri 8 Feb 2008, 16:19, archived)
If something can happily be made smaller with no great loss in quality, it may as well be.
(, Fri 8 Feb 2008, 16:21, archived)
forgive my ignorance but are 5x100k gifs any bigger than 1x500k gif, i do understand the dial up bit.
(, Fri 8 Feb 2008, 16:23, archived)
i guess you get to see more little gifs and stuff before your connection blows up, making the visit more worthwhile.
more b3ta for your money.
(, Fri 8 Feb 2008, 16:31, archived)
Or to put it another way, if you're on b3ta for an hour or two each day, you'll end up using less bandwidth if people stay inside the filesize limits, and be less likely to go over your limit and have to pay.
(, Fri 8 Feb 2008, 16:33, archived)
i will have to try and refrain from reposting stuff.
(, Fri 8 Feb 2008, 16:38, archived)
I for one would like you to continue reposting your stuff
(, Fri 8 Feb 2008, 16:42, archived)
But I think it's safe to assume that if everyone kept within the guidelines, bandwitch usage wouldn't be as high.
I see where you are coming from though. George Bush had the same idea to get around the Kyoto agreement.

(, Fri 8 Feb 2008, 16:29, archived)
but some of us unfortunate souls have a tiny monthly bandwitch allowance.
And some of us have no bloody choice as the bandwitch is restricted by the only telecomms company in the country that provides bandwitch.
A couple of days ago I didn't spend that long on B3ta and noticed that I'd used 49mb in an incredibly short time.
I am starting to use my allowance in a shorter time just by using my PC for normal day to day usage (that includes B3ta).

(, Fri 8 Feb 2008, 16:25, archived)