this took me fucking aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaages.......
it better be worth it.
sauce: www.impawards.com/1995/posters/seven_ver1.jpg
spesh.,
Fri 23 Oct 2009, 15:10,
archived)
So which one's strapped to the table and causes everyone to shit themselves when it springs back to life?
(,
Fri 23 Oct 2009, 15:16,
archived)
8, surely.
2 Can Chunder Word to your mums, I came to prod bums,
Fri 23 Oct 2009, 15:16,
archived)
Windows 7 has been ruined for me by their marketing campaign.It works really well and looks nice, but people will laugh at me for using it after the stupid 'launch party' idea and the family guy thing, which I've seen a clip from that made me vomit all over my computer.
( 2 Can Chunder Word to your mums, I came to prod bums,
Fri 23 Oct 2009, 15:28,
archived)
I just wish they'd send me my serial #Utter utter pricks
(
Maximinimus you stick around I'll make it worth your while,
Fri 23 Oct 2009, 15:30,
archived)
how/where did you order?I got mine right after the purchase
(
pzyko Query failed.,
Fri 23 Oct 2009, 15:33,
archived)
well, their numbering scheme is a mess(as Windows 7 is actually an NT 6.1)
( pzyko Query failed.,
Fri 23 Oct 2009, 15:30,
archived)
Their numbering systemhas been confused by combining two different lines. The 95/98/ME line is ultimately a development of the 3.1/3.11 line, shells that sit on top of DOS even if by the time of ME it was mainly used to bootstrap the system. The NT4.1/2000/XP/Vista/7 line is instead a development of the NT3.1 line. Which I don't think had an NT2.0 because they dicked with the numbers to get it in line with Windows 3.1. 2000 was I think NT5.0, XP NT5.1, then Vista was NT6.0 and 7 is NT6.1.
The numbers are fucking meaningless, in the end. So they want to call it "7". It makes as much sense as the rest of their numbering...
(The numbers are fucking meaningless, in the end. So they want to call it "7". It makes as much sense as the rest of their numbering...
boris the spider,
Fri 23 Oct 2009, 15:38,
archived)