^This. Hard.I don't understand why they don't just get all the blood they can, and then test it all, rejecting the bad blood.
They say they test it all for HIV and hepatitis anyway before they use it, so what's the problem?
(They say they test it all for HIV and hepatitis anyway before they use it, so what's the problem?
Barbarossa is not my real name,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 15:58,
archived)
Damn Ninja Edits
Laird Dave Draws Now charges to take off his clothes.,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:04,
archived)
HIV tests aren't very accurateAnd it can take months to show anything even though you may be HIV positive.
(
Maximinimus you stick around I'll make it worth your while,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:02,
archived)
yeahthat's how they got my auntie.
Most of the south west Porn business was put on hold for months!
(Most of the south west Porn business was put on hold for months!
Laird Dave Draws Now charges to take off his clothes.,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:03,
archived)
You'd think that they could easily just not allowanyone who has had unprotected sex during the previous x months (however long it takes to have an accurate result) from donating, regardless of sexuality.
I'm sure if they phrased their rules better then they could still block people who are high-risk without appearing homophobic.
(I'm sure if they phrased their rules better then they could still block people who are high-risk without appearing homophobic.
monkeon schmonkeon,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:46,
archived)
I'm pretty sure you could, I'd agree
Jessie © needs pirate name suggestions,
Tue 27 Oct 2009, 16:49,
archived)