Not saying that
The figure is irrelevant, ANY figure is irrelevant, unless you provide source, no?
It grates on me he admonishes the lack of "science" while doing the exact same thing. Would have thought he'd be up on that.
( , Thu 30 Jul 2015, 10:53, Share, Reply)
The figure is irrelevant, ANY figure is irrelevant, unless you provide source, no?
It grates on me he admonishes the lack of "science" while doing the exact same thing. Would have thought he'd be up on that.
( , Thu 30 Jul 2015, 10:53, Share, Reply)
It could easily be relevant.
However, a source (or some account of how the figure was derived) would make it more credible.
It'd be fallacious to think that a source is necessary for relevance, though.
( , Thu 30 Jul 2015, 10:56, Share, Reply)
However, a source (or some account of how the figure was derived) would make it more credible.
It'd be fallacious to think that a source is necessary for relevance, though.
( , Thu 30 Jul 2015, 10:56, Share, Reply)
Again I'm not saying that.
I wouldn't be surprised at that figure at all, and it didn't look odd. Perhaps it's my own issue, but surely if you were to call someone out on hyperbole, you'd at least back up your own figures from the outset.
Although this is the internet i 'spose.
( , Thu 30 Jul 2015, 11:04, Share, Reply)
I wouldn't be surprised at that figure at all, and it didn't look odd. Perhaps it's my own issue, but surely if you were to call someone out on hyperbole, you'd at least back up your own figures from the outset.
Although this is the internet i 'spose.
( , Thu 30 Jul 2015, 11:04, Share, Reply)