how has IQ any revelance if you've just said it's arbitrary?
It's like saying people don't listen to the message because they are generally below 4.3 Quacknoodles, Cumquat's threshold level of Nogginatiousness
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Wed 19 Apr 2017, 14:25,
Share,
Reply)
IQ does have relevance. It's the perfect measure of how good you are at IQ tests.
(
DinivanX Has stinging piss after drinking Pact Coffee, Wed 19 Apr 2017, 14:51,
Share,
Reply)
And there is a correlation between low IQ
and being totally fucking thick.
(, Wed 19 Apr 2017, 15:06, Share, Reply)
True but there's a correlation between people getting terrible scores in all manner of tests and being totally fucking thick. It's a test of ability in a given area.
(
DinivanX Has stinging piss after drinking Pact Coffee, Wed 19 Apr 2017, 16:10,
Share,
Reply)
I apologise for failing to communicate effectively.
The figure of 100 for the score at the top of normal distribution is what is arbitrary. They simply decided that the commonest level of intelligence would score 100. They could have chosen 50. Or 75. They didn't. They chose 100.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Wed 19 Apr 2017, 15:09,
Share,
Reply)