slow down cowboy
"The full findings of the research discussed in this article will be published later this year, following peer review."
That means it'll all be shit because peer review is a pointless process.
(, Fri 11 Aug 2017, 16:10, Share, Reply)
Ooooh, burn!
gfycat.com/SizzlingKeenCardinal
(
BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Fri 11 Aug 2017, 16:16,
Share,
Reply)
That's going to smart a bit
(
evil_andy Stick stick stick stick sticky sticky stick stick, Fri 11 Aug 2017, 16:35,
Share,
Reply)
it depends on the subject dunnit?
wanky social science can be as peer reviewed as much as you like and all it'll prove that is they don't have any clearly insane assumptions.
A chemist, a physicist and an economist are on a desert island with cans of food and no opener.
'we'll use the corrosoive action of sea water!' says the chemist
'that'll ruin the food!'
The physicist suggests putting them on a fire
'Shrapnel and baked bean burns!'
Then the economist chips in:
'let's hypothesise a tin opener.'
(
The Ann Coulter Fan Club Babylon is burning at, Fri 11 Aug 2017, 16:56,
Share,
Reply)