London bash photos
Here they are, given I shot in raw they took a while to process. I've hosted them on photobox because it's a completely free service despite the fact most of the images are between 6 to 10 mb, which is very nice of them! You should be able to click for big and get the full frame beast they are. Also, don't think i'm being a blatent capitalist here and trying to make a buck on the side; I don't make any money from any prints you might order; it's public, non-commercial hosting.
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:21, Reply)
Here they are, given I shot in raw they took a while to process. I've hosted them on photobox because it's a completely free service despite the fact most of the images are between 6 to 10 mb, which is very nice of them! You should be able to click for big and get the full frame beast they are. Also, don't think i'm being a blatent capitalist here and trying to make a buck on the side; I don't make any money from any prints you might order; it's public, non-commercial hosting.
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:21, Reply)
Could you name a few names?
I know a few from previous sightings but it'd be nice to know the others.
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:28, Reply)
I know a few from previous sightings but it'd be nice to know the others.
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:28, Reply)
I'll get round to it but am suddenly having quite a busy day
godsavethequeen will be hosting them on flickr tomorrow hopefully!
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:30, Reply)
godsavethequeen will be hosting them on flickr tomorrow hopefully!
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:30, Reply)
indeed he will
but if you think he's gunna be naming them all you've got another thing coming, mostly because i don't have a clue who any of you are.
ashally i'm only a bit stuck on 3 of you, and yes you're one of them.
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:59, Reply)
but if you think he's gunna be naming them all you've got another thing coming, mostly because i don't have a clue who any of you are.
ashally i'm only a bit stuck on 3 of you, and yes you're one of them.
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:59, Reply)
Good work that man
Can't seem to be able to click them bigger though. Guess I'll have to sign up for that.
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:35, Reply)
Can't seem to be able to click them bigger though. Guess I'll have to sign up for that.
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:35, Reply)
Damn!
That was the entire point of hosting them there! I made the album as public and stuff and seem to be able to do so myself. Guess we'll have to wait for Mark to upload them
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:42, Reply)
That was the entire point of hosting them there! I made the album as public and stuff and seem to be able to do so myself. Guess we'll have to wait for Mark to upload them
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:42, Reply)
It's working for me?
www.photobox.co.uk/my/photo?album_id=116659331&photo_id=2079501972
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:47, Reply)
www.photobox.co.uk/my/photo?album_id=116659331&photo_id=2079501972
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 11:47, Reply)
Yes, but that's a smaller photo, I think
/edit: and some of mine: www.flickr.com/photos/mediocre/sets/72157619047858589/
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 12:03, Reply)
/edit: and some of mine: www.flickr.com/photos/mediocre/sets/72157619047858589/
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 12:03, Reply)
'only' lol
Its not about the camera its the person behind it. I know a pro photographer still using a 400D and he produces shots of a much higher quality than his rival down the street.
Still, I would want a 50D too :)
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 13:11, Reply)
Its not about the camera its the person behind it. I know a pro photographer still using a 400D and he produces shots of a much higher quality than his rival down the street.
Still, I would want a 50D too :)
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 13:11, Reply)
God, gorgeous sir
Though that one of me has just almost made me cry.
That said, if you would let me have a copy of the one with Dixon, Prof and me on I would be very grateful :)
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 12:50, Reply)
Though that one of me has just almost made me cry.
That said, if you would let me have a copy of the one with Dixon, Prof and me on I would be very grateful :)
( , Tue 2 Jun 2009, 12:50, Reply)