Expressing opinions without permission or prior education is textbook behaviour for reactionaries.
You should be more tolerant of other people's views.
( The Mock TurtIe ™ --- Thinks you are a cunt, on, Sun 4 Dec 2011, 0:27, 2 replies)

Now I'm intolerant?
On top of everything else im guilty of for bothering to offer anything on this topic that's quite a burden
(CADmonkey rollllllllled another one, just like the other one, Sun 4 Dec 2011, 11:09, closed)

From MGTs 'bollocks' linky above:
"While preparing his epochal volume, A History of Nutrition, published in 1957, Professor E. V. McCollum (Johns Hopkins university), sometimes called America's foremost nutritionist and certainly a pioneer in the field, reviewed approximately 200,000 published scientific papers, recording experiments with food, their properties, their utilization and their effects on animals and men. The material covered the period from the mid-18th century to 1940. From this great repository of scientific inquiry, McCollum selected those experiments which he regarded as significant "to relate the story of progress in discovering human error in this segment of science [of nutrition]".

Professor McCollum failed to record a single controlled scientific experiment with sugar between 1816 and 1940. unhappily, we must remind ourselves that scientists today, and always, accomplish little without a sponsor."
(CADmonkey rollllllllled another one, just like the other one, Sun 4 Dec 2011, 11:35, closed)

Yeah
Because scientists never destroy orthodoxy and progress human knowledge do they. It's not as if such behaviour would be rewarded with a rich prize, fame and fortune is it.


You're entering 'dumb as fuck' territory now.
( Ring Of Fire A petty, drooling belming butthurt retard., Sun 4 Dec 2011, 12:49, closed)