b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 1587015

After performing routine maintenance on my time machine, I suddenly had a revelation.
Up until this morning, I had no idea how the acceleration chamber was capable of handling the super-mass ratio of tictons to the standard "chemistry" subatomic particles, as the magnets were incapable of affecting anything without a charge, meaning neutrons would be ejected into third-space upon transmission, undoubtedly killing the traveler and forcing his atoms into nuclear decay.

The only explanation is that neutrons simply don't exist, at least not as a singular particle. As my theory has hinted, neutrons are actually an amalgamation of electrons, positrons, and some currently unnamed "third state" particle (or possibly an inverse binding force), bundled together by their own opposite charges, and separated into a super-low density crystalline structure (so as to avoid self-annihilation).

Protons are mostly positrons, held together by the inward forces of the orbiting electrons, in turn filling the holes in the principle of electronegativity on a sub-subatomic scale.

Electrons account for all the normal mass in the universe. Positrons account for the "missing" mass.

In addition, this may also account for the so-called "zero point energy" that permeates vacuums, which would be generated by the "third state" particle/inverse bond, with an apparently greater range of effect than most particles, though this is just a hypothesis.

However, this entire theory supports my idea of a trinary universe. A very exciting day for SCIENCE!
(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:37, archived)
I'm trying to read it but my eyes are refusing to take it in. Sorry.

(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:39, archived)
Thought you went to bed Emma

(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:40, archived)
Nah, I'm nowhere near tired.

(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:41, archived)
However that has little if nothing to do with time travel

(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:39, archived)
Quite the contrary, the machine works around this very principle.

(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:40, archived)

www.diamond.ac.uk/default.htm

/Works in nuclear industry
(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:40, archived)
Is that you on the front page?
That fat man? =P
(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:42, archived)
I work here
www.ukaea.org.uk/sites/harwell_site.htm
(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:45, archived)
I built my stuff in a basement. =P

(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:46, archived)
There is a story of some lad trying to build a reactor in his cellar
... he got his radioactive sources from colleges and unis, he actually had a fair amount of radioactive stuff knocking about, enough for the guys who went in to get it back to have to wear protective clothing
(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:50, archived)
I'd love to have some of that, but I'd be too scared to handle it.
My project only calls for tiny amounts of radium, though only for electron capture, so I prefer to simulate the effect electrically. I could probably get my hands on some radium, but I'm lazy and I don't feel like rebuilding everything.
(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:53, archived)
Hehe
we use radium sources for our trainees to play with, you'd be amazed at going round some of the old sites where it was used (watch /clock factories) and finding the levels of contamination in drains etc..
(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:59, archived)
this is bullshit
/just spent a semester studying atomic and nuclear physics
(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:40, archived)
You
have read too many Feynman books. /aicmfp

*munkehs around*
(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:41, archived)
Who?

(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:42, archived)
Erm...
...Richard Feynman - intrinsic values of teh universe/expositions on the ideas of inflationary as opposed to static universes, etc etc. He am a dead man now, but used to be brilliant.

*still munkehing around*
(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:44, archived)
I try to read only non-biased sources, personally.
There's so many people who love to smash their theories in your face.



LIKE ME!
(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:46, archived)
Without teh theory-in-face-smashing-types,
we'd all still be eating grass and leaves and oooking a lot... ahhhh I miss those days. Ook Oook!

*Munkeh munkeh munkehing to teh max*
(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:47, archived)
WHAT?

(, Sun 28 May 2006, 3:46, archived)