
I only believe in one God less than you do, how do you know you've picked the right one?
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 0:47, archived)

but a /talk user can post more questions than a wise man can answer.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:10, archived)

( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:17, archived)

apologies.
What do you regard as "proof" exactly? Given that empirical science only falsifies its theories, while proof in the absolute sense only exists in mathematics.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:25, archived)

I take it you mean empirical evidence? But all empirical evidence of the senses has to be interpreted to draw any conclusions from it, by use of our powers of logical reasoning. In practice we also tend to employ a great many assumptions. What I am saying to you is that the existence of physical material substance as the basis for all phenomena is such an assumption that we owe to times far past but we still cling to even after science has rendered it untenable, because, as you say, modern atheists reject the alternative a-priori as "irrational" despite the fact that it is the only explanation that remains that makes any sense.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:40, archived)

Would it not be more reasonable to just admit that we don't know some things and perhaps never will?
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:44, archived)