
At least, no more so than that I don't believe in gravitational force, or electrons. The history of reality is what it is. The question is what reality is.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 0:52, archived)

it is our own human interpretation of sense data. So is gravity. The sense data is consistent in certain ways, is all we can say. We label where it comes from as "physical matter" but that is just a metaphysical brick wall.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:01, archived)

( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:03, archived)

But "self reference" is a central concept. Or to put the problem concisely, "how does reality bootstrap?"
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:09, archived)

( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:18, archived)

I don't doubt it. But it doesn't have a great deal of impact on my theology. Although I've lately started to come round to the idea that evolution is theologically significant in a positive way.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:23, archived)

How old do you believe the Earth to be?
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:25, archived)

this gets complex. I fear it may be beyond the remit of the side of the page.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:32, archived)

If we are created in God's image, why do we have so many imperfections? Surely God is perfect and therefore so must we be?
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:37, archived)

at this point, whether by "image" you are thinking "physical appearance". This is not the case. It is the mental image I speak of, such faculties as powers of reason and creativity, which beasts may possess in some small measure but reached increasing fulfillment as evolution progressed.
( , Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:43, archived)