Site's back up, thanks.And neither I nor Jake are claiming ownership of nohands - he was a foster kitten and I have no idea who he belongs to now. The _photo_ of nohands, however, was definitely taken by Jake. And since he doesn't care how people use it, it's effectively in the public domain. But not because it was posted on a web site. _That's_ the point I'm trying to make. Internet != Public Domain.
Christ. If I can get the people who live in that apartment now to let me in and take a picture of the windowsill, would that prove anything? Or would people just claim that I'd faked it?
(,
Tue 24 Feb 2004, 19:28,
archived)
Christ. If I can get the people who live in that apartment now to let me in and take a picture of the windowsill, would that prove anything? Or would people just claim that I'd faked it?