But today's fact scared the fuck out of me.
wannafeelold.tumblr.com/post/106470240/eh-ohld
:(
How are you all this lovely Monday night? Any facts that make you feel old?
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:31, archived)
I'm 23.
Sometimes, I think the business could be run more efficiently if all these fucking kids were replaced with dedicated, professional staff.
Oh, and I have first-hand memories of Snap's "The Power" being released.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:33, archived)
That tellytubbies one doesn't bother me.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:34, archived)
I get so many emailed to me I lose track of them :(
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:34, archived)
wannafeelold.tumblr.com/post/96782005/this
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:36, archived)
even though I was born in 1987.
Before my time.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:37, archived)
His mum and dad were out, but his hot older sister was IN! YESS!
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:44, archived)
than a ladybird book?
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:12, archived)
pointlessmuseum.com/computer/default.html
Should probably read it again, actually...
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:17, archived)
in a plain brown cover so the staff wouldn't be embarrassed reading it.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:24, archived)
People in the 1960's reading books that weren't published until 1971. Wow.
They were all well accustomed to reading stuff that came in brown paper, I take it.
I'm impressed how many women apparently worked with computers in the 1970's. It's almost like a modern-day university engineering department prospectus. Having said that, my gran worked with a computer in the 1950's. MoD as well. From what she's told me, it was rubbish, the size of a room or no.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:28, archived)
the fact is still true tho..
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:38, archived)
How it Works: The Computer was used by university lecturers to make sure that students started at the same level. Two hundred copies of this same book were ordered by the Ministry of Defence. The MOD wanted the books to be bound in plain brown covers and without any copyright information, to save embarrassing their trainees!
actually, it was printed in the 60s :P
www.theweeweb.co.uk/ladybird/ladybird_history.php
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:39, archived)
but it's a good fact (or otherwise), so I think I'll keep it anyway.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:40, archived)
"The rarest Ladybird book - so elusive, it seems, that not one collector has even seen one - is The Computer from the How it works series, produced privately for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) in 1972."
www.independent.co.uk/money/spend-save/this-is-how-it-works-bunnikin-wonk-and-the-tinker-will-make-their-owners-richer-547624.html
This is a mystery.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:46, archived)
custom one ordered a few years later, maybe?
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:47, archived)
the above citation appears to be some kind of paraphrase of Ladybird's own text on the subject, which doesn't mention a date but has simply been assumed to be in correct chronological order.
www.ladybird.co.uk/aboutus/companyhistory.html
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:51, archived)
I was just eBaying to see if I could get a copy to take into my open-notes Computer Science exams. You're allowed one textbook, and I'd have liked that one.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:48, archived)
Can't be that rare, I found two copies selling for under a fiver each. Maybe reprints, though.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:51, archived)
I misread the bit on rarity and thought it applied to all versions of the book, not just the MoD one.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 1:56, archived)
And the Usborne Spotter's Guide to Dinosaurs, however much sense that does or does not make.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 2:01, archived)
It was as I was househunting in Leeds if I recall correctly
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:37, archived)
than there is time passed between me passing my driving test and now :(
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:35, archived)
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:36, archived)
I'll leave you to do the maths there.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:39, archived)
MASSIVELY CONTROVERSIAL
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:43, archived)
One can take one's driving test.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:44, archived)
I'll leave you to carry on with the mathematics problem though.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:46, archived)
If you had taken your test a year ago, and she had taken it in the last 6 months (for instance), what you just said would still hold.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:49, archived)
The mathematics is even simpler in this case. I'll simplify it down into days for you though...
I passed my test 6,510 days ago, when I was 6,318 days old.
The earliest my daughter could take her test is on her 17th birthday which would make her 6,209 days old.
6,510 - 6,209 = 301 days difference.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:56, archived)
Especially since you didn't mention when you passed your test.
(, Tue 12 May 2009, 0:58, archived)