i dont think the constituency boundaries are the problem.Its because the labour vote tends to be concentrated in urban areas whereas the libdem vote is fairly evenly spread across the country.
(,
Mon 19 Apr 2010, 13:10,
archived)
well, yeahthat's kind of what i'm meaning -- there are too many constituencies in the cities. there's been a tendency towards moving out of the cities, and a few redrawn boundaries within the cities. neither very big, so far as ive heard, but big enough to leave urban constituencies with generally fewer voters who are generally more likely to be natural labour voters. then you have urban constituencies, who are less likely to be labour, covering much wider ground and these days more people.
the way i see it there's two conclusions you can draw from that. either the boundaries suck and should be redrawn (the one i've taken), or the whole system sucks and we should scrap it and go to pure PR.
either way, i'd say *something* has to change.
(the way i see it there's two conclusions you can draw from that. either the boundaries suck and should be redrawn (the one i've taken), or the whole system sucks and we should scrap it and go to pure PR.
either way, i'd say *something* has to change.
boris the spider,
Mon 19 Apr 2010, 13:14,
archived)
The population rise of the last 20 years has been concentrated in the cities.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/why-capturing-the-magic-number-of-seats-is-harder-for-the-tories-1930594.html
is fairly interesting. it's doesn't particularly back up my actual claims but it's the same kind of reasoning. depends whether you trust the independent, but it's not traditionally the most hideously tory of papers...
(is fairly interesting. it's doesn't particularly back up my actual claims but it's the same kind of reasoning. depends whether you trust the independent, but it's not traditionally the most hideously tory of papers...
boris the spider,
Mon 19 Apr 2010, 13:34,
archived)