I'm a bit confused about the idea of shutting down Twitter and Facebookin the event of 'serious social disorder'.
Has anyone said how they envisage that working? Do they mean they'll completely block access to the servers in the UK?
I'm pretty sure everyone on here must be aware how utterly useless that would be, and how many dozens of ways around it there are. There really cannot possibly be any other reason for suggesting it than to score a few points with media-illiterate fucktards. It's fucking pathetic.
(Has anyone said how they envisage that working? Do they mean they'll completely block access to the servers in the UK?
I'm pretty sure everyone on here must be aware how utterly useless that would be, and how many dozens of ways around it there are. There really cannot possibly be any other reason for suggesting it than to score a few points with media-illiterate fucktards. It's fucking pathetic.
mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 18:33,
archived)
it's an empty promiseto placate the gullible
(
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 18:38,
archived)
I'm all for turning off facebook :DWhat no one seems to remember (except us oldies) is that in the 80s we had the illegal rave scene where somehow thousands
of people turned up to a massive rave in the middle of nowhere.
There were no mobile phone, no internet, no twitter. Nuffink.
And yet we managed to communicate this info without the police finding out.
I'm off to buy a CB radio.
:D
(of people turned up to a massive rave in the middle of nowhere.
There were no mobile phone, no internet, no twitter. Nuffink.
And yet we managed to communicate this info without the police finding out.
I'm off to buy a CB radio.
:D
camp freddy well, would you look at that!,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 18:42,
archived)
ah, CB'si could throw a 30+ to south wales using a coat hanger as an aerial
( Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 18:48,
archived)