Should've combined UKIP with Hidden Horrors just to piss off the 2 people who tried to fix it
( ,
Thu 1 May 2014, 10:01,
archived)
Your guess as good as mine
I watched the stats follow the same pattern of voting as previous dubious high votes.
( ,
Thu 1 May 2014, 11:35,
archived)
you mean it's fixed because 2 options were more popular than the others?
( ,
Thu 1 May 2014, 12:08,
archived)
Nope I mean 2 people using multiple accts and I'd guess proxy servers
Normally when a legit vote is initially tight an eventual trend will emerge especially over a lengthy time.
When 2 people are determined it'll stay neck and neck all the way each trying to out do the other, they stopped around 11 pm ish when it was 70 votes all square, couple of probably legit votes over night swung it hidden horrors direction.
I took an interest when it exceeded 50 allowing for the extra voting time, and it followed the exact same pattern as previous dubious ones, they try to keep it subtle.
I've got no objection to making pics for either - imjusayin what I see
( ,
Thu 1 May 2014, 12:20,
archived)
When 2 people are determined it'll stay neck and neck all the way each trying to out do the other, they stopped around 11 pm ish when it was 70 votes all square, couple of probably legit votes over night swung it hidden horrors direction.
I took an interest when it exceeded 50 allowing for the extra voting time, and it followed the exact same pattern as previous dubious ones, they try to keep it subtle.
I've got no objection to making pics for either - imjusayin what I see
I find it hard to believe that the vote is so important to two people
that they would use up so much time and effort
( ,
Thu 1 May 2014, 12:27,
archived)
I find it hard to believe aswell and quite sad why they would
I can't be bothered to go back through the mini-poll stats and point out the same rigged votes - enough time wasted already
Time to shop the Hidden Horrors of UKIP :)
( ,
Thu 1 May 2014, 13:01,
archived)
Time to shop the Hidden Horrors of UKIP :)