Can X-raying Richard Gere for hamsters
just have its own challenge section?
( ,
Fri 16 May 2003, 17:03,
archived)
Whine Whine Whine Whine Whine Whine Whine Whine Whine
Whine Whine Whine Whine Whine Whine Whine
whine whine whine whine whine whine whine
whine whine whine whine whine whine whine
~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~
... ... ... ... ... ... ...
( ,
Fri 16 May 2003, 17:05,
archived)
whine whine whine whine whine whine whine
whine whine whine whine whine whine whine
~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~
... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Come to think of it, is the hamPster fossilised?
Or how else would its soft tissue show up in an x-ray? Hmm?
( ,
Fri 16 May 2003, 17:05,
archived)
Oh for the love of god!
When was B3ta ever a representation of the real world?
( ,
Fri 16 May 2003, 17:07,
archived)
On the contrary,
it has a grossly disproportionate amount of pedantic gits in its population. :)
( ,
Fri 16 May 2003, 17:08,
archived)
Damn you
for subtly implying my incompetence at forgetting to link the picture...
( ,
Fri 16 May 2003, 17:12,
archived)
That's not Mr Pedantic...
That's a chimp with Elvis' head photoshopped on, and a newspaper photoshopped into it's stubby fists.
/pedant
( ,
Fri 16 May 2003, 17:14,
archived)
/pedant
True. but Grammar seems to be more of.....
....Mr Pedantic's cup of tea. Not the physical properties of x-rays. For god sake it is a picture frame with a bit of green glass in it!
( ,
Fri 16 May 2003, 17:10,
archived)