Ooo
nice bogging of the eyes there.
There's really no point in doing my name
( ,
Wed 4 Jun 2003, 14:20,
archived)
There's really no point in doing my name
Mmm
Like to know WTF this is all about. Made me laff.
www.vs-gaissau.salzburg.at/sams.jpg
( ,
Wed 4 Jun 2003, 14:26,
archived)
www.vs-gaissau.salzburg.at/sams.jpg
yikes!
unfortunately to stick to the rules, you have to use the first result in each case. shame, cos that is a great source pic
( ,
Wed 4 Jun 2003, 14:28,
archived)
Depends how you search
Do samso and nite or sams and onite or something...
( ,
Wed 4 Jun 2003, 14:24,
archived)
i've
been away for a fortnight , what's all this googlism malarky about then?
( ,
Wed 4 Jun 2003, 14:22,
archived)
take your name
split it into 2 pieces however you like, then google for images. take the first image from each part of your name, and shop them together.
Edit: no matter how I split my name, all I get is text for at least one of the images! :(
( ,
Wed 4 Jun 2003, 14:24,
archived)
Edit: no matter how I split my name, all I get is text for at least one of the images! :(
No matter how i split
my name i always get a picture of me, which kind of defeats the purpose
( ,
Wed 4 Jun 2003, 14:29,
archived)
But i always
looks the same (apart from in the mornings), so i would just be changing a jacket or trousers
( ,
Wed 4 Jun 2003, 14:32,
archived)
it's not really
search for "wouldswapabearforat" and "iger" if you like.
( ,
Wed 4 Jun 2003, 14:32,
archived)
there's a pterodactyl
or some similar in as part of the letter head on a search for "e". Admittedly though, you have limited resourses there.
( ,
Wed 4 Jun 2003, 14:31,
archived)
I tried doing mine
but realised that the sheer amount of results returned render it no different to any other bit of photoshopping.
( ,
Wed 4 Jun 2003, 14:29,
archived)
whats with all the googalisms?
i prefered the 'make an image of somebodys name and everyone try to guess who it is' phase.
that was fun.
( ,
Wed 4 Jun 2003, 14:31,
archived)
that was fun.