b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 1874640 (Thread)

# so long as someone adds in
message notification without the need to F5...
(I helped save b3ta! JustHere4Coffee remembers when all o' this were car parks, Fri 29 Aug 2003, 22:20, archived)
# I've already thought of a very cunning scheme for that
(I helped save b3ta! Mr Peet, Fri 29 Aug 2003, 22:21, archived)
# i've got that sorted
to some degree already, but munkt0n don't want frames, so it's useless the way i've done it (meta refesh tags in seperate messages and users online frames)
(I helped save b3ta! Dr. Kitteny Berk almost certainly drunk, Fri 29 Aug 2003, 22:22, archived)
# that's the old way
it was a pain, really...
(I helped save b3ta! JustHere4Coffee remembers when all o' this were car parks, Fri 29 Aug 2003, 22:26, archived)
# indeed
but it worked, and it worked well
(I helped save b3ta! Dr. Kitteny Berk almost certainly drunk, Fri 29 Aug 2003, 22:27, archived)
# I'm not sure if that'll go in
until we think of a way to finance the thing. I could be wrong, but I think all the bandwidth eaten by auto-refreshing is part of why m3ss3ng3r was so bandwidth-hungry.
(I helped save b3ta! supermoore: HUNG, Fri 29 Aug 2003, 22:23, archived)
# To correct myself.
It doesn't have to work that way, and will be much less bandwidth-hungry without all the Javascript.
(I helped save b3ta! supermoore: HUNG, Fri 29 Aug 2003, 22:24, archived)
# it should be
reasonably light this time, for the messages it's under 1k of code that'd refresh
(I helped save b3ta! Dr. Kitteny Berk almost certainly drunk, Fri 29 Aug 2003, 22:25, archived)