nope, well six, but they'd probably have caught the plague anyway.
in fact it was about 97.5% of BENEFICIAL cos it killed the plague rats and let them sort out the streets.
( ,
Sun 28 Sep 2003, 19:42,
archived)
i thought
they were already known in principle, but never acted upon. certainly the method of dealing with fires at the time was to hastily construct them by demolishing houses around the blaze, but the mayor of the day was reticent to 'cos of the cost
( ,
Sun 28 Sep 2003, 19:46,
archived)
reluctant, not reticent.
that would mean he was the silent, mysterious type towards them, like a building-regulations james dean.
( ,
Sun 28 Sep 2003, 19:47,
archived)
You'd have to give him that one
by definition 3.
dictionary.reference.com/search?q=reticent
( ,
Sun 28 Sep 2003, 19:50,
archived)
dictionary.reference.com/search?q=reticent
I think you meant
cited, not sited
/hand-that-feeds-him-biting-pedantry
( ,
Sun 28 Sep 2003, 19:52,
archived)
/hand-that-feeds-him-biting-pedantry
yeah, but it's reluctant as in personality and being the withdrawn, loner type more than anything else.
and i like the idea of a building-regulations james dean.
( ,
Sun 28 Sep 2003, 19:52,
archived)
yes
how very stupid of me
great way of putting it
edit: yay i was not incorrect after all
( ,
Sun 28 Sep 2003, 19:50,
archived)
great way of putting it
edit: yay i was not incorrect after all