gods you say?


From the If the World was Ginger challenge. See all 312 entries (closed)

( evilamnesiac puts the sensual into non-consensual, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:25, archived)

I hate Dawkins.
This sways my judgement of your image unfairly and I would woo, but am afraid I might be overcompensating.
( Pedantichrist twitter.com/LordManley, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:27, archived)

He does have some good points in his arguments
(assumes that you're an atheist)
(Pjotr, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:31, archived)

*is not an atheist*
That said, I can reason and the man is a fucking religious nutcase.

Proper fundy.
( Pedantichrist twitter.com/LordManley, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:33, archived)

As I see it
you can't really "prove" the existence of god, so in a way, there's no need for all these arguments, as long as people aren't being killed for their beliefs.. oh, wait..
(Pjotr, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:34, archived)

My personal stance is that it surpasses man's understanding.
I am happy with that. I have my own beliefs, but they are exactly that - the secret of life is a guessing game and people who guess differently to me are not wrong, they just have a different idea.

Saying other people's opinions on something which is beyond proof are wrong is wrong.

Intolerance is about the only thing I cannot tolerate - I believe in deregulation and that, so long as it doesn't effect other people, folk should do as they wish.
( Pedantichrist twitter.com/LordManley, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:38, archived)

and shoot the catholics
of course?
( Pasanonic so I compo anything with words, right?, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:47, archived)

What?
Dawkings is obviously right, and anyone who disagrees with him is a porridge-for-brains fuckhead.
( Watney Heckbulb uhnnnnnnnn has a PhD now! Woo!, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:36, archived)

That seems to be his stance,
yes.
( Pedantichrist twitter.com/LordManley, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:41, archived)

Here here
. . even if climbing mount improbable is the most boring thing i've ever read.
(gleam has been selling these fine leather jackets since, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 21:42, archived)

TALK BOARD.
God damned debaters
( evilamnesiac puts the sensual into non-consensual, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:37, archived)

I will have to disagree.

( Pedantichrist twitter.com/LordManley, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:42, archived)

I shall Woo for two then

(Mark3y needs to put some welly in to it, Wed 6 Jun 2007, 20:32, archived)