yeah, I know, links board etc..
www.journalism.co.uk/news/story3385.shtml
t is simply not true that we steal people's work and, to stop any claims in future, we have taken a view that we will only publish images where we have contacted the creator in advance and they have consented in writing.'
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:17,
archived)
t is simply not true that we steal people's work and, to stop any claims in future, we have taken a view that we will only publish images where we have contacted the creator in advance and they have consented in writing.'
WOO!
*has never had enough hummus to have any pictures stolen but is pleased for all the talented bastards*
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:18,
archived)
*actually finishes reading the article*
Wait a minute, fucking bastards!!!
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:20,
archived)
ha ha ha
I firmly believe if I posted anything other than text, they wouldn't be interested in that either
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:20,
archived)
i mean, they take all that shit from bbdo, TGA and manic
and won't touch my stuff? what is the world coming to!
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:24,
archived)
I'm thinking about posting to the talk board about...
erm... Michelle Marsh and Sam Cooke and then claim they stole them
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:28,
archived)
I have't a fookin clue who any of them are
but I think the description 'cheap looking bird with the big tits' is probably bang on the money...
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:33,
archived)
well, that'll be a result if they stick to it
but it is simply not true that we steal people's work
what a shower of cocks
edit - I just saw this circumstances are such that we believe the originator would have wanted to have their image brought to the attention of a wider audience
that's ok, then
cunts
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:20,
archived)
what a shower of cocks
edit - I just saw this circumstances are such that we believe the originator would have wanted to have their image brought to the attention of a wider audience
that's ok, then
cunts
*glees in anticipation*
I'm about to go for lunch... should I wait?
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:21,
archived)
and in next week's issue,
The Lovely Keeley, 21, locks the stable door after the horse has bolted - and she'll be doing it topless!
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:21,
archived)
Pathetic, snivelling little rats.
Not enough talent themselves so they have to leech from others- I'd call it flattery except it's so greasy and ugly- just like their common, carling swilling, knuckle dragging readers.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:21,
archived)
Hello lovely.
*doffs the tricorner which still hasn't arrived yet*
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:23,
archived)
fuck yeah!
I've shown everyone, suprised you haven't seen it:
cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=017&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWN%3AIT&viewitem=&item=270136777180&rd=1&rd=1
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:27,
archived)
cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=017&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWN%3AIT&viewitem=&item=270136777180&rd=1&rd=1
*cries forever and ever.*
cgi.ebay.co.uk/PIRATE-HAT-WITH-HAIR-ADULT-FANCY-DRESS-COSTUME_W0QQitemZ230146586409QQihZ013QQcategoryZ58449QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
this guy thinks he's Carl McCoy. Carl McCoy the cunt, that is.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:29,
archived)
this guy thinks he's Carl McCoy. Carl McCoy the cunt, that is.
he's put me off
my missus has a thing for Dick Turpin, so this sort of hat might do
except I haven't got the hair for it any more
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:38,
archived)
except I haven't got the hair for it any more
I'm so tempted by those.
Not that I don't have lovely hair anyway, I just want a choice.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:41,
archived)
Does she love 80s Adam Ant?
Humna humna says the captain *nods*
Get a leather brimmed hat and then beat the crap out of it.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:40,
archived)
Get a leather brimmed hat and then beat the crap out of it.
that's what happened to my Carl McCoy hat
I beat it till it was the right shape
then it got covered in flour and dirt from 15th-century graves
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:43,
archived)
then it got covered in flour and dirt from 15th-century graves
:D Goffik.
I need a proper leather hat so I can mistreat it until it gives in. Or make manwife wear it until it gives in (he wears in my belts)
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:44,
archived)
'ning captain.
i've a good mind to manipulate a found copyrighted image for no reason at all, just because.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:24,
archived)
Well you know what I mean.
There's a difference between find, change, publish and find, publish.
Oh let me have my war.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:25,
archived)
Oh let me have my war.
"...B3ta, a British online community to which graphic designers submit satirical photographic mashups and montages..."
pah
*grumps*
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:23,
archived)
pah
*grumps*
gotta fade out in a montage
edit: also - afterning lovely capitan
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:29,
archived)
haha
I'm glad to see CDCs come under 'satirical photographic mashups and montages'
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:24,
archived)
It is entirely true
that we are all bored graphic designers. Even if we don't realise it.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:58,
archived)
i don't believe that they try and contact the originator of the work at all
i mean, manics tag was still on his work, if they had bothered to look at his site they would have seen his article and could have email him directly to seek permission.
i think Emap are cunts, i am boycotting their magazines. the cunts.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:25,
archived)
i think Emap are cunts, i am boycotting their magazines. the cunts.
Why would you want to buy them anyway?
If you want porn, buy porn. I object to them trying to pretend they're actually a lad's mag when it's just tits and scummy attitudes.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:28,
archived)
Or scummy tits and attitudes depending on how you look at it.
*prefers to look at it from behind her lovely Bizarre magazine*
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:30,
archived)
^ THIS
Nuts and Zoo are for warty teenage boys with limp dicks who don't have the balls to ask for proper porn AICMFP
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:32,
archived)
who on earth still actually buys porn?
it's what the interweb is for.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:38,
archived)
they produce a surprisinf aray of magazines.
i for one am going to miss my monthly edition of 'creative cross stitcher'.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:33,
archived)
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
I only need three more sections of pattern and I can start stitching 'Sonja 21's tits!
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:34,
archived)
Ooh, good point
Sorry, I'd missed that you said the company not magazine
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:41,
archived)
I...
...think I'll have to invoice some folks from now on. Only problem is you don't often know when folk are using images.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:27,
archived)
Graphic designers?
We're not all graphic designers. What a strange thing to say about b3ta.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:32,
archived)
Next weeks image compo....
rip the shit outta Zoo, Nuts and any other mags published by the same firm.
Sounds like they are fair game now and just begging to be shopped in the most malicious way possible.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:36,
archived)
Sounds like they are fair game now and just begging to be shopped in the most malicious way possible.
Manwife started his new graphic designer job in Oxford today, bless him.
I'm not a graphic designer. I'm paid to be nice to people.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:34,
archived)
I'm not a graphic designer either
I'm a civil servant and project manager. I have no formal design or art qualifications beyond GCSE Art.
Still. Zoo have not yet stolen any vectors :)
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:37,
archived)
Still. Zoo have not yet stolen any vectors :)
I *am* a graphic designer
with no formal qualifications whatsoever, except a degree in archaeology
very useful
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:40,
archived)
very useful
I can see that it would be
I myself find that my 2:1 in Microbiology is very useful for doing a job that is mainly law :)
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:44,
archived)
I'd love to have done something like that.
Nobody needs someone with obsolete editing skills who's handy with a steadycam, do they?
:-( No, I didn't think so.
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:46,
archived)
:-( No, I didn't think so.
That is always said whenever b3ta is written about
bored graphic designers, each and everyone of us
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 14:02,
archived)
It's a women's fashion mag innit
What they be wanting with b3ta stuff?
( ,
Mon 2 Jul 2007, 13:36,
archived)