*Chances arm*
From the New Logos For Old challenge. See all 549 entries (closed)
( , Thu 28 Feb 2008, 3:11, archived)
From the New Logos For Old challenge. See all 549 entries (closed)
( , Thu 28 Feb 2008, 3:11, archived)
from what I gather, "Web 2.0" is nothing more than simplified, shaded graphics, emporers new clothes and all that
or have I missed something important?
( ,
Thu 28 Feb 2008, 3:24,
archived)
people use it to also mean the fusion of two existing technologies,
or adding networking.
for example, sms+cheesestring = twitter
and facebook
( ,
Thu 28 Feb 2008, 3:26,
archived)
for example, sms+cheesestring = twitter
and facebook
ohh, social networking stuff?
the problem with that kind of thing is there's just TOO MANY numpties out there you wouldn't even want to talk to online, let alone meet
( ,
Thu 28 Feb 2008, 3:45,
archived)
yeah but b3ta is far far far from the likes of facebook etc.
though I'm only guessing because I avoid facebook etc. like the plague
( ,
Thu 28 Feb 2008, 4:11,
archived)
It means that they write "beta" next to their logo instead of using underconstruction.gif
( ,
Thu 28 Feb 2008, 3:26,
archived)
I think it includes stuff like AJAX that turns the web from
simple static pages to pages that can be updated in part without refreshing the lot.
I too am skeptical as to whether it's really 2.0 or just the 'ongoing evolution of web tech'.
( ,
Thu 28 Feb 2008, 3:30,
archived)
I too am skeptical as to whether it's really 2.0 or just the 'ongoing evolution of web tech'.
of course it's not really 2.0.
it's just shameless marketing by and to idiots.
AND DO NOT GET ME STARTED ON LIBRARY 2.0, OH FUCK
( ,
Thu 28 Feb 2008, 3:40,
archived)
AND DO NOT GET ME STARTED ON LIBRARY 2.0, OH FUCK
Nothing wrong with being kiwi.
I've 1/64th royal Maori blood m'self.
Now show some f'n ruspict or U'll get me bros and come fill you en.
( ,
Thu 28 Feb 2008, 4:49,
archived)
Now show some f'n ruspict or U'll get me bros and come fill you en.
the word is "rangatira".
and you can't have a fraction of a person.. unless we're talking dissection
( ,
Thu 28 Feb 2008, 4:51,
archived)
and you can't have a fraction of a person.. unless we're talking dissection
HAVE YOU NOT BEEN PAYING ATTENTION THESE PAST FIVE YEARS
also having participated in designing staff training in web two point fucking oh (libraries are prone to bandwagonning just about any stupid trendy idea) I found the most satisfying commentary came from similarly cynical and disaffected bodies.
effinglibrarian.blogspot.com/search/label/library%202.0
I was however sadly unable to include the gloss "THIS IS A BLOG. IT IS FOR BLOG" in our course design
( ,
Thu 28 Feb 2008, 4:03,
archived)
also having participated in designing staff training in web two point fucking oh (libraries are prone to bandwagonning just about any stupid trendy idea) I found the most satisfying commentary came from similarly cynical and disaffected bodies.
effinglibrarian.blogspot.com/search/label/library%202.0
I was however sadly unable to include the gloss "THIS IS A BLOG. IT IS FOR BLOG" in our course design