My last pair set me back £130, even an optician laughed and said I was a muppet for paying so much for shades
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:11, archived)
I'm not going through another summer having to choose between non-blindy and fuzzy or blind but in perfect focus...
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:13, archived)
30 years of sun blindness!
I just bought some damn sexy Police* ones!
*Not the coppers!!
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:15, archived)
but as I work all day in front of a computer I may need to keep my glasses on me.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:17, archived)
They are so annoying, if you can get monthly or daily ones they are supposed to be much comfier.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:19, archived)
Mine were £15 a month from specsavers. I'vce looked at buying them from an online retailer, but my bad eye (technically, worse eye) has such a strong prescription that most of the online sites don't cater for them.
/blind as a whatsit blog
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:43, archived)
but one potential drawback is making any excess light sensitivity worse because they will always react (albeit not fully) to marginally increased light levels
I get by with normal glasses, but use (daily) disposable contact lenses (I have a minor astigmatism, but normal [non-toric] lenses produce a good enough correction) whenever I need to wear sunglasses (usually when sea kayaking).
If I ever wanted to do the ladeez-who-lunch thing and sit in the sun guzzling lattes during my lunch break, then I would probably get prescription sunglasses. I'm not a woman though, so that isn't really a problem :P
Oh, and daily disposable lenses are usually thin/moist enough to last an entire working day; if you go for monthly ones, then you might end up with dry eyes and need glasses as a back up etc.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:24, archived)
I was told not to get my lenses near water. bacteria and all that...
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:45, archived)
but it isn't an issue with daily lenses; you bin them so is there no chance for anything (bugs, protein deposits etc.) to build up on them.
also (according to the last optician/dispensing optician I asked about this), sea water is less likely to contain anything nasty than (untreated) fresh water; it's more sterile apparently.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:54, archived)
I used to do it all the time. The only risk is that if you go through rapids or down a fall and you don't close your eyes in time and get a face full of water, they may get washed up to the top of your eyes. Don't worry though, they drift back down shortly after. I developed the habit of doing rapids with one eye only slightly open, so if the fully open one got the lens washed up I could still see out of one eye.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 14:55, archived)
I had failed to grasp this, Captain! ;)
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:29, archived)
She works on b3ta, and so is in front of a computer all day.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:29, archived)
I didn't even know you knew glasses to be honest.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:21, archived)
as they always seem to reflect whatever light's in the room.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:22, archived)
and rub the fronts of their trousers etc.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:26, archived)
Ca depende.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:28, archived)
They make me look marginally less freaky looking.
Although they shroud my light-cannot-escape-from-its-surface eyes.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:30, archived)
but they have lasted me 4 years so far, would have got through 2753 cheap pairs by now so all works out in the end.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:14, archived)
Bloc. Which are like Oakley but without the ridiculous mark up and bicycle courier stigma.
www.eyeweardirect.co.uk/index.php?cPath=1_4
(, Sun 2 Mar 2008, 22:19, archived)

