Well whattaya know eh
In my defense, I've been on holiday and it didn't show up on the preview ;)
( , Sun 14 Dec 2008, 12:10, Share, Reply)
In my defense, I've been on holiday and it didn't show up on the preview ;)
( , Sun 14 Dec 2008, 12:10, Share, Reply)
i almost posted it twice yesterday
because it didnt show up as already being on. How curious..perhaps the interwebz are broken
( , Sun 14 Dec 2008, 12:17, Share, Reply)
because it didnt show up as already being on. How curious..perhaps the interwebz are broken
( , Sun 14 Dec 2008, 12:17, Share, Reply)
I think it was posted @ 5 times yesterday
Someone once said that the glass-cock checker only works for archived links (usually those over @1 week old)
( , Sun 14 Dec 2008, 12:42, Share, Reply)
Someone once said that the glass-cock checker only works for archived links (usually those over @1 week old)
( , Sun 14 Dec 2008, 12:42, Share, Reply)
I don't know about that
but a more straight forward issue is that for apps like this append the video id on the end of the url "/?id=y4dday4ddA" the gc checker will reference each one as a new link. So it won't register as a gc, unless someone posts exactly the same video. Similar principle if a video occur on two separate sites (or youtube accounts).
Secondly, searching for the url, it appears that most people who posted it yesterday, (as well as using separate videos) referenced it in replies, and not as new links. The checker doesn't look at replies, so you'll not get a warning.
( , Sun 14 Dec 2008, 12:55, Share, Reply)
but a more straight forward issue is that for apps like this append the video id on the end of the url "/?id=y4dday4ddA" the gc checker will reference each one as a new link. So it won't register as a gc, unless someone posts exactly the same video. Similar principle if a video occur on two separate sites (or youtube accounts).
Secondly, searching for the url, it appears that most people who posted it yesterday, (as well as using separate videos) referenced it in replies, and not as new links. The checker doesn't look at replies, so you'll not get a warning.
( , Sun 14 Dec 2008, 12:55, Share, Reply)