peer reviewing ...
... in certain physics journals.

Not a very exciting story, though.
(haberman is singing in the changes, Sun 17 Jan 2010, 21:08, 4 replies)

It's not all that anonymous
if your field is small enough (mine is) and you have a recognisable style (I'm told I do).

Maybe this is why I have so little published...
(dxg, Mon 18 Jan 2010, 0:45, closed)

That, or your constant invitations
to "come to my office, I have some results I think you'll find interesting. They reveal something I call...the strong erotic force."
(apeloverage committed the vile act of onanism on, Mon 18 Jan 2010, 7:58, closed)

I love it when you get a review...
...and it says "You seems to have missed a few key papers. This is very surprising. Please add citations to these works"

followed by a list of 5 papers all by the same person. Who still thinks their review is anonymous.
( Olembe Refuses to write in this space, Mon 18 Jan 2010, 12:30, closed)

heh
... better still, suggest 5 papers by someone else,
to throw them off the scent.
(haberman is singing in the changes, Mon 18 Jan 2010, 15:54, closed)