I sincerely hope
none of the guests abstained from meat for religious reasons, because in such a case pulling that kind of juvenile crap is even more reprehensible.
(louveciennes , Volvospotter, Thu 18 Sep 2008, 17:07, 3 replies)

it is unclear to me
how sincerely held (secular) vegetarian beliefs are somehow less worthy than sincerely held (religious) vegetarian beliefs.

In any case, were the V crowd misinformed about the comestibles, or did they just assume they were vegetarian?
(haberman is singing in the changes, Thu 18 Sep 2008, 17:29, closed)

It's unclear
to me too.

But still agree with louveciennes about the reprehensibleness.
( warmfuzzies Isn't here, Fri 19 Sep 2008, 14:07, closed)

Don't see a mention of any lying to them or such like
Just sounds like they made assumptions and we all know where that usually leads - Someone gets a gobful of meat.

They probably didn't noitce the meat content of the snacks because they were too busy irritating the non-veggies in the other room.

Top story :D
(Peljammy Watching Godzilla, Thu 18 Sep 2008, 18:21, closed)

can i just say
in all seriousness to louveciennes is there any chance you could just go and fuck your self

no seriously, with a leg of pork
( spimf ™ is whoever you want him to be, Thu 18 Sep 2008, 18:41, closed)

^
this, just this.

Sorry louveciennes (or however you spell it), nothing personal, but it's not like he killed thier baby, he just let their own wankerism fuck them up.

top story.

clickage
(misskitty reeks of sex and turpentine; laudanum afternoons, Sun 21 Sep 2008, 9:57, closed)