b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10090929 (Thread)

# As far as I can make out,
the only people complaining are the broadcasters like Sky Sports. I figure it's because they have an idea of what a football match should be like, and their viewers have an expectation of what a football match should be like, and they're worried their viewers will be turned off by being offered a football experience that is outside of their usual cultural sphere. Europeans expect singing and chanting; that's what happens at a football match if you're European. Personally I think the broadcasters are being a bit patronising by assuming that their viewers are so small-minded, that's what TV is all about these days - they would rather change the facts to fit the expected story than just report the facts - and sports reporting is no different.
(, Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:36, archived)
# Maybe the irritating horns are irritating people?
(, Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:50, archived)
# Maybe some people.
But they're cunts.
(, Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:53, archived)
# You're biased, clearly.
The only time I've heard those horns is when it was decided that it's fun to "rickroll" with them. If I had to tolerate that tuneless dirge for longer than 30 seconds I'd be irritated.
(, Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:55, archived)
# I'm sure unexpected vuvuzelas are both shocking and upsetting,
but to go to a football match and complain about the noise is a bit much. They may be annoying when taken out of the context of a lively football match, but in their proper setting they are no worse than any other form of terrace vocalisation.
(, Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:59, archived)
# I disagree. It's a subjective matter but I'd argue that they're more annoying to those that dislike them than they are fun to those who like them.
I'm bored of drrrrhorns now anyway. GOOD DEBATING A+++
(, Mon 14 Jun 2010, 19:01, archived)
# WOULD DEBATE AGAIN
(, Mon 14 Jun 2010, 19:09, archived)