oh, i don't know about that
i'm sure we'd all find it interesting if you held your breath for an hour or so
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 21:31,
archived)
Given how you've used the last 4 years I would imagine paint drying would enthral you too..
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 21:50,
archived)
To recap, You responded to my original post re: Manuel with an ad hominem, and I'm the one that's trying?
Interesting take on reality you have
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:03,
archived)
Interesting take on reality you have
you know what? just forget it
you're clearly incensed by things you have no control over and feel the need to vent in a childish manner.
therefore, i choose not to spend any more time conversing with someone with the keen social grasp of a stickle brick.
enjoy what you laughingly refer to as your life, you odd little person.
goodbye.
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:08,
archived)
therefore, i choose not to spend any more time conversing with someone with the keen social grasp of a stickle brick.
enjoy what you laughingly refer to as your life, you odd little person.
goodbye.
Can I jump in?
And wave brightly-coloured flags around?
I am the voice of reason, after all, even with my diagnosis.
You don't know what you've started. You really don't.
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 23:27,
archived)
I am the voice of reason, after all, even with my diagnosis.
You don't know what you've started. You really don't.
unless you can back up what you've been doing for the last 4 years
don't take cheap shots at people like that, you make yourself look stoopidddddd, srs bizniz etc
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 21:56,
archived)
the sad thing is
i assumed it was a regular doing a spot of trolling, but it seems he actually is serious
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 21:59,
archived)
just another 100000 forums to go
it's going to be a busy crimbo for him
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:03,
archived)
Err NOT posting to b3ta at a rate of one post every 45 minutes. Very easy to check..... You know, if you know how
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:07,
archived)
someone could post many replies in a short space of time, maybe when a conversation gets going
just a thought....
EDIT: also rob has a profile, you could have just sent him a message or an email with your view (he may have even replied then), now it seems you were just looking to stir up shit, otherwise you would have posted and moved on.
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:13,
archived)
EDIT: also rob has a profile, you could have just sent him a message or an email with your view (he may have even replied then), now it seems you were just looking to stir up shit, otherwise you would have posted and moved on.
That's a not a very good argument.
I mean we're all online, often finding a way to waste time, can anyone say that's productive? Here you seem to be going for a provocative approach, but all you're doing here is name-calling and not really productively using your time in constructive debate or argument. I'd move on bud.
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:11,
archived)
There are responses to my comments that are valid and have warranted a reasoned reply
What though would you propose is the Appropriate response to being referred to as an intestinal parasite?
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:50,
archived)
What though would you propose is the Appropriate response to being referred to as an intestinal parasite?
None, move on gracefully.
Focus your intentions elsewhere. It's about not turning round and going "nyeh nyeh" and blowing raspberries back that strengthens your argument. If you attend to every person calling you names you'll never get a moment's peace. You can apply that this situation as well. Rob may have an opinion, but goading him and calling him an "internet cunt" just seems petty and childish and not particularly productive.
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:58,
archived)