explainMaybe I've exaggerated a bit in terms of duration (I didn't look up details on half-life periods of the radioactive materials used there just now), but I'm strictly against a technology which can seriously fuck up a country's economy and ecosystem when blowing up, even if the chance for it doing so is pretty low (not speaking of the problems with long-term storage and the limited uranium supply). I just don't understand why nuclear reactors are still being built and promoted when there's lots of alternative technologies readily available which can as well supply the required amount of power.
(
pzyko Query failed.,
Thu 31 Mar 2011, 11:49,
archived)