
this is the awesomeness of digital, you can take a hundred and only get one good shot but because there are no expensive processing fees, it all seems worth it. I barely even pick up my me super or k1000 anymore becuse it costs so much for the paper and to hire the university darkroom. When I can afford all the bits though, I'm fitting out my study with my own darkroom.
Incase you are interested though, theis is my Flickr, which I haven't updated in ages. I don't think I've even shown it to anyone before.
www.flickr.com/photos/jlmeehan/
edit: now I remember 1. why I hated the kit lens and 2. why I should've been shooting raw.
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 10:54,
archived)
Incase you are interested though, theis is my Flickr, which I haven't updated in ages. I don't think I've even shown it to anyone before.
www.flickr.com/photos/jlmeehan/
edit: now I remember 1. why I hated the kit lens and 2. why I should've been shooting raw.

You've clearly got a fondness for low angles, vanishing-point perspective, and other ways in which architects wished people regarded their environments.
*clix*
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 11:02,
archived)
*clix*

but these photos would have come out much better had I not been pretending that trying to shoot no-flash and no-tripod at night was a good idea.
As for the vanishing point perspective, I did photography GCSE and A level and my teacher was insistant that following lines was the only way to shoot and therefore everything I take has an all too prescribed feel.
I'm glad you like them though.
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 11:09,
archived)
As for the vanishing point perspective, I did photography GCSE and A level and my teacher was insistant that following lines was the only way to shoot and therefore everything I take has an all too prescribed feel.
I'm glad you like them though.