HahahaReminds me of this from 'Terror's march backwards'
'16th: Speculation about US retaliation grows. Expert opinion is divided over whether the 'medievalist' regime of Afghanistan should be bombed back to the Stone Age or forward into the twenty-first century. The prevailing Hawk argument runs: 'There's a big stone at the back of the Stone Age and we'll bomb them so hard back into that, they'll bounce all the way forward to 2002.' '
www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/mar/17/september11.terrorism (Armando Iannucci and Chris Morris)
('16th: Speculation about US retaliation grows. Expert opinion is divided over whether the 'medievalist' regime of Afghanistan should be bombed back to the Stone Age or forward into the twenty-first century. The prevailing Hawk argument runs: 'There's a big stone at the back of the Stone Age and we'll bomb them so hard back into that, they'll bounce all the way forward to 2002.' '
www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/mar/17/september11.terrorism (Armando Iannucci and Chris Morris)
2 Can Chunder Word to your mums, I came to prod bums,
Sun 8 May 2011, 13:43,
archived)