![Challenge Entry: Crucial Design Flaws [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
From the Crucial Design Flaws challenge. See all 138 entries (closed)
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 0:32, archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I'm fairly exhausted by defending my profession from the opprobium aimed correctly at these fuckers.
But hey, I'm here now. If anyone has a question.
( ,
Fri 8 Jul 2011, 1:07,
archived)
But hey, I'm here now. If anyone has a question.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Most of us know that this practice was widespread amongst investigative journalists. Personally I'd rather see The Daily Mail dead.
( ,
Fri 8 Jul 2011, 1:46,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I imagine other papers won't emerge from this with clean hands either.
Now the cat's out of the bag, it's as if a cat has suddenly emerged from a bag. After being kept in a bag for a very long time.
( ,
Fri 8 Jul 2011, 1:59,
archived)
Now the cat's out of the bag, it's as if a cat has suddenly emerged from a bag. After being kept in a bag for a very long time.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I shall use it often.
( ,
Fri 8 Jul 2011, 2:14,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
News on the radio of NoW's fate was accompanied by someone saying "168 years of tradition. . ." I didn't hear the rest as I laughed "yeah, they said something similar about Barings Bank, too."
No questions yet, but I would not be surprised if you are preparing an entry for this QOTW.
( ,
Fri 8 Jul 2011, 3:22,
archived)
No questions yet, but I would not be surprised if you are preparing an entry for this QOTW.