Hoo hoo, I know all about that. :PI spent many a moon on Fallout 3. Absolutely love that game...
...not so keen on New Vegas though, feels more like a western game than a post-apocalyptic one. Or modern-day Texas.
(...not so keen on New Vegas though, feels more like a western game than a post-apocalyptic one. Or modern-day Texas.
Bourbon Fox Bourbon is a moron,
Thu 24 Nov 2011, 17:01,
archived)
For all the crazy sci-fi; New Vegas felt a more plausable post-apoc game.If the US was bombed to hell, people would have to flee to the deserts, because, aside from regions located near airbases, they'd be the least likely to suffer from fallout.
Probably why the game's not as much fun as Fallout 3.
(Probably why the game's not as much fun as Fallout 3.
JollyJack - a stench from the past,
Thu 24 Nov 2011, 17:08,
archived)
Valid point.There is still quite a lot of open land in FO3, but nowhere near as much as NV, which had to be at least 70% desert.
I prefer FO3 in terms of environment (going through old government buildings, vaults, etc is ace), and just the fact that is has nowhere near as many bugs and glitches as NV. I once had a save delete itself.
(I prefer FO3 in terms of environment (going through old government buildings, vaults, etc is ace), and just the fact that is has nowhere near as many bugs and glitches as NV. I once had a save delete itself.
Bourbon Fox Bourbon is a moron,
Thu 24 Nov 2011, 17:19,
archived)