that really is too big
687k is too big.
(
joshwa ultra lurker,
Thu 19 Jun 2003, 17:30,
archived)
I really
don't notice it.
(
so long and thanks for all the fish,
Thu 19 Jun 2003, 17:30,
archived)
i don't either
but it would be a nightmare for dialup.
(
Lumpbucket tekcubpmuL,
Thu 19 Jun 2003, 17:35,
archived)
yes, yes it is
it's interesting that we have a theoretical guideline for image size, but not for threads. A small but very woo! image can attract so many animated responses, the thread can be upwards of 500k.
(
supermoore: HUNG,
Thu 19 Jun 2003, 17:38,
archived)
i think the reason for that is
that nobody cares.
(
Lumpbucket tekcubpmuL,
Thu 19 Jun 2003, 17:42,
archived)
I assumed as much
:)
(
supermoore: HUNG,
Thu 19 Jun 2003, 17:45,
archived)