1: I have no idea.
2: Don't do it!!!!! Take it to a cleaner - it's cheaper than a new coat.
(2: Don't do it!!!!! Take it to a cleaner - it's cheaper than a new coat.
mother inferior - now fully in compliance with the Trades Descriptions Act, being both a mother and inferior,
Thu 4 Mar 2004, 12:34,
archived)
wasn't expecting an answer for 1
but 2, what if i did it for experimental purposes? the coat wasn't that expensive
(but 2, what if i did it for experimental purposes? the coat wasn't that expensive
SarahRatt,
Thu 4 Mar 2004, 12:36,
archived)
if you do it for experimental purposesat least have the decency to post your results on the interweb ;)
(
mostly harmless John Leslie raped me on,
Thu 4 Mar 2004, 12:39,
archived)
I concur.But if you like the coat, don't do it.
( mother inferior - now fully in compliance with the Trades Descriptions Act, being both a mother and inferior,
Thu 4 Mar 2004, 12:40,
archived)
must try it thenI'll do it on my next day off (i'm workking in a bit)
( SarahRatt,
Thu 4 Mar 2004, 12:41,
archived)
just when you weren't expecting ittj1: it's an attempt to get around spam blockers that test the message for likely spam phrases. It doesn't seem to work (or at least the spam block magic in my office seems to catch the bulk of them).
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie,
Thu 4 Mar 2004, 12:41,
archived)