Does the practice of peer reviewing researchrestrict the development of science because it's more difficult for revolutionary/outlandish (delete as applicable) theories to get published?
You can add credibility to an incoherent pub debate I was having. Obviously, if your answer doesn't support my argument, I'll bury it.
(You can add credibility to an incoherent pub debate I was having. Obviously, if your answer doesn't support my argument, I'll bury it.
bert grr picked his feet in Poughkeepsie,
Mon 1 Sep 2008, 22:48,
archived)